DhimmiTube scandal continues

More days pass and YouTube is still allowing Terrorists and thier sympathisers free reign on YouTube while continuing to suppress Conservative and Anti-Jihad videos.

They are still refusing to respond to the very public complaints put up by Michelle Malkin and others, further showing thier extreme bias and abject subservience to wacko leftist and terrorist ideologies and groups.

I have decided to join the efforts of the Conservative YouTube group and to do anything I can to try and take YouTube back from the leftists and jihadis. I have tried to assist the cause by uploading Michelle Malkin's video, "First They Came" to YouTube. I found it was rejected almost instantly. I will continue to try and upload the video to YouTube, but in the meantime, here it is on Googlevideo:

I ask all right-minded people to create a YouTube account and upload this video to YouTube. (Video download here) Be aware, they ARE watching for this video and actively rejecting it from being posted. But the more we can get it up there, even under different names, the more we can get the message out.

We also need to find ways to actively fight back against the Jihadists who are negatively flagging Conservative videos on the site. I am looking for an enterprising Conservative programmer to whip up a small shell script or executable that would allow us to automatically search and bulk flag videos by known jihadists and terrorist sympathisers.

With enough of us using a program like this, we can flood the jihadis with negative flags and keep thier garbage off of YouTube. We would also create the rather nice additional effect of hammering YouTube with tons of video moderations, essentially DDOSing thier moderation system. With luck it will force them to fix it or remove it entirely.

The Dhimmis at YouTube need to learn that capitulating to the Jihadis won't protect you. If you are with them, you are against us and you WILL pay the price. We will not allow YouTube to be overrun by Jihadis, even against the wishes of YouTube's owners.



UPDATE: Conservative YouTuber deanayer makes an excellent point in a discussion on YouTube about this very subject:

They are looking at more than the name, they are looking at the videos exact file length as well as its name, format, encoding run time etc. All that forms a "fingerprint" of the video.

They may also be doing even more advanced analysis like frame grab comparisons either by check-sum error or binary data searches looking for strings of binary video information that compose a single image.

The way around it would be to take the video and slightly lengthen it, lighten it, darken it, re-encode it, etc. If you add one second to it of anything (at the beginning preferrably) and slightly alter its overall appearance by changing the lighting levels it will encode as somethign totally unrecognizable.

If you are going to do this with "first they came" than make 4-5 variations so that they appear as 4-5 totally different videos to their filter. Pass them around via email to people outside the group to upload.

Since the actual video file is a .wmv file, anyone with Windows XP can use the built in Windows Movie maker to take the video and make a small alteration to it as deanayer suggests. Remember, don't make the change too drastic, just a minor alteration and it will change the checksum enough to get by thier filters. Then get on YouTube and post it. Let's take back YouTube!



UPDATE: Success! Using Ulead Video Studio 8 I was able to add a short amount of black screen to the beginning of Michelle's video and successfully upload it to YouTube. Take THAT DhimmiTube! Here's the video from YouTube:

Now all I need is someone with some spare webspace to host these so other conservatives can snag them and use them to flood YouTube. Any takers?

We've been had!

Drudge is breaking the news now. The entire Foleygate scandal is a HOAX! Full text of the Drudge report below

According to two people close to former congressional page Jordan Edmund, the now famous lurid AOL Instant Message exchanges that led to the resignation of Mark Foley were part of an online prank that by mistake got into the hands of enemy political operatives, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.

According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats. This source, an ally of Edmund, also adamantly proclaims that the former page is not a homosexual. The prank scenario was confirmed by a second associate of Edmund.

The news come on the heels that former FBI Chief Louis Freeh has been named to investigate the mess.

Developing...

One wonders just exactly HOW these IM logs got into the hands of Dem Operatives. What one does NOT wonder is why they didn't FACT CHECK the IMs with the original owners, as the screen names were on the IM logs.

As reported by Passionate American and The Oklahoman, it wasn't difficult to find out who the screen names were. Obviously the Dems were salivating at the chance for an October Surprise. (As they are being absolutely crushed on every other item of any importance in the upcoming Elections.) Apparently they wanted their October Surprise so badly they they were willing to (Shock!) ignore the facts and bend the truth to their desires to try and gain some votes.

Somehow I think it's going to bite them on the butt HARD come election day. I don't know about you, but I'll be listening for the collective Democrat yelp when that happens.

I can't wait!

----------------------------

Update: Drudge has updated the text on his site with further information. Here is the text:

According to two people close to former congressional page Jordan Edmund, the now famous lurid AOL Instant Message exchanges that led to the resignation of Mark Foley were part of an online prank that by mistake got into the hands of enemy political operatives, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.

According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats.

The primary source, an ally of Edmund, adamantly proclaims that the former page is not a homosexual. The prank scenario was confirmed by a second associate of Edmund. Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.

The news come on the heels that Edmund has hired former Timothy McVeigh attorney, Stephen Jones.

I will continue to update this until all the facts are known. But it's looking more and more like a nasty prank gone awry. I'd say some former pages are going to be spending time in court, and MANY MANY Democrats will be in need of towels to wipe the egg off thier faces.

Update: Drudge has added the following to his report:

The prank scenario only applies to the Edmund IM sessions and does not necessarily apply to any other exchanges between the former congressman and others.

Of course, what happened in the IM exchanges is really the crux of the entire scandal anyway. As it has already been determined that the e-mail content, while creepily over-frendly, did not violate any ethics rules or laws. The big smoking gun here seems to be turning into a Looney Tunes-esque BANG-flag gun.

This is a Smoking Gun?

More details as they are available.

Update: ABC News suddenly gets three anonymous tips from alleged pages, one of who's comments seem directly aimed at Drudge...

"This was no prank," said one of the three former pages who talked to ABC News today about his experience with the congressman.

Maybe I'm getting a tad jaded, but this revelation seems suspiciously timed. The fact that it came in via an "anonymous tip line" isn't exactly points in it's favor. Somehow I think that the three "Pages" will turn out to be three misguided KOS Kidz trying to prevent the Drudge bombshell from having any effect. Unfortunately I suspect that ABC won't do it's homework and it will once again fall to the conservative blogoshpere to do the background checks.

Of course, if they turn out to be for real, The question needs to be asked why they didn't come forward and speak to the house Ethics committee rather than ABC News? I have a deep suspicion of "victims" that don't go to the authorities when they are victimized, but go to the press. They almost always turn out to be either liars or complicit in some way. We shall see.

More updates as they become available.

Update: Michelle Malkin has coverage as well.

YouTube Overrun

You Tube has been overrun by Terrorist apologists and Jihadi sympathizers.

As you can see in the title link, Even Michelle Malkin has been kicked off YouTube due to having so many complaints lodged against her. Despite the fact that her videos have always been insightful and witty, despite the fact that they have never EVEN ONCE come CLOSE to violating YouTubes TOS, she was summarily and rudely booted off YouTube. She's not the only one, Conservative voices are being forcibly silenced all over YouTube, while Pornographers, NeoNazis and Terrorist sympathizers and recruiters get a free ride.

This type of blatant and overt discrimination cannot be allowed to stand. All conservative thinking YouTube users need to complain to YouTube. Let them hear our voices loud and clear. We will not stand by while Terrorists are allowed to use YouTube as a recruiting ground and supporters of our troops are banned.

In the meantime, may I suggest to all conservative YouTubers (YouTubers? What, are we potatoes now?) that they consider becoming Conservative Googlevid-ers? The Google video system is less dependent on "Social Networking" for video ratings, so it's less prone to Jihadis flooding the complaint channels. It also has a far nicer Embed interface for websites. Much more professional looking than YouTube's big ugly buttons and hideous red bar. Okay, the moniker "Googlevid-er" doesn't roll off the tongue as easily. Maybe "G-Vider" is better. Not that it really matters anyway.

Here is a video I uploaded to google video today. It seemed appropriate:




Let's make the move. Leave YouTube to the Jihadis until the Feds come and cart their servers away. Move to Google Video, and let's show the DUmbocrats just what kind of market power we Conservatives can bring to bear as we singlehandedly help Google Video crush YouTube.